Italy will organize a referendum on the abrogation of 5 laws in the justice system. But referendum requests about decriminalizing of cannabis and assisted suicide have been deemed inadmissible.
The Constitutional Court of Italy evaluated 8 referendum requests on February 15 and 16 to decide if they were admissible for a vote from the Italian population. On February 16, the Court announced all the results.
With the Constitutional Court decision, Italians will be able to decide on the abrogation of five laws affecting the justice system.
Referendum requests for the reforms of justice collected more than 4.2 million signatures. They were notably promoted by Lega Nord, the far-right populist party led by Matteo Salvini. The Italian Radicals, an libertarian political movement also supported them.
The popular vote ought to be organized in spring. Popular referendums in Italy allow the population to decide whether it abrogates a law. The minimum threshold for considering a petition is the signature of 500,000 Italian voters. Participation needs to be above 50% of eligible voters to be valid.
On February 15, the Constitutional Court first deemed admissible four questions for a referendum, because “the respective requests do not fall under any of the hypotheses for which the constitutional order excludes a recourse to a referendum”.
Potential abrogations of Italian laws related to justice in a referendum
The Court accepted the request for changing incarceration procedure. The referendum will ask if the custody of offenders should be removed when the potential sentence is less than 4 years of prison. Similarly, it will seek Italians’ opinion to apply preventive detention only to suspects facing no less than a 5-year jail time. Potential repeat offenses would not affected by the change.
A question will be related to the Severino Law against corruption from 2012. The referendum aims at removing automatic office suspension and ineligibility of convicted elected officials. If abrogated, such decision would instead be given by judges.
Italians will also decide whether magistrates must chose between being a prosecutor or a judge at the beginning of their career. A decision they would need to stick to throughout their work life if the law is abrogated.
Magistrates of the High Council of the Judiciary may not need support from other magistrates to be elected if Italians decide to reform the judiciary organ. Advocates of the reform consider it will help remove a cast system and elections based on internal politics.
Moreover, with the referendum, magistrates may not only be evaluated by their peers but also by lawyers or law professors in judiciary councils.
The Constitutional Court only rejected one referendum request related to judiciary.
It was related to the civil responsibility of judges while doing their job. The referendum foresaw the possibility for convicted citizens to challenge judges and make them personally liable if a justice decision proved to be wrong. The law currently allows citizens to bring the State of Italy to court for seeking reparation.
Referendum requests on euthanasia and decriminalization of cannabis rejected
The civil motion for a referendum on consensual homicide, received 1.2 million signatures. As the first of their 8 decisions, the court considered it inadmissible. It justified that a “minimum protection of human life constitutionally necessary would not be preserved, particularly in regards to vulnerable and weak persons”.
The Constitutional Court yet considered in 2019 that a person who facilitates the execution of an assisted suicide was “not punishable” under “certain conditions”.
The president of the Court Giuliano Amato justified during the press conference on Wednesday that the referendum on consensual homicide would have made many cases other than euthanasia and assisted suicide legal.
The petition to allow personal use of cannabis received 600,000 signatures. It collected 500,000 digital signatures in a week since an amendment raised by member of parliament Riccardo Magi from the party More Europe.
The question focused on removing the word “cultivate” marijuana for personal consumption from being a crime. The referendum would have also proposed to remove driving license suspensions for transporting narcotic or psychotic substances for personal use.
It was however rejected by the Constitutional Court because the way the request was formulated would have also included cultivating poppy and coca, which would have been against international laws, the president justified.
A referendum request for abrogating a law being denied doesn’t bar from the parliament to amend legislation.